Findings

Findings are the evidence-backed story behind your score. Each scan produces strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Every item cites crawl evidence — page URLs plus short excerpts — so you can verify and ship fixes with confidence.

Finding types

Evidence-linked recommendations

Every recommendation includes:

• Priority — 1 is highest urgency; sort and ship in that order when capacity is limited.
• Why — why the gap matters for AI discoverability.
• Impact — expected effect on visibility if fixed.
• Evidence — one to three crawl citations (url + excerpt) from your site corpus.

Recommended workflow

1. 1

   Sort by priority

   Start with priority 1–3 recommendations. Free plans show a preview (typically top recommendations and a limited weakness set); Pro unlocks the full list.

2. 2

   Map to Studio assets

   Many recommendations map directly to Content Studio types — faq, schema, llms_txt, docs, comparison, and more.

3. 3

   Add to the weekly plan

   Promote findings into the Weekly Execution Plan so work is sequenced with effort and impact labels.

4. 4

   Verify after ship

   Rescan or wait for monitoring to confirm weaknesses clear and strengths hold.

Plan gating

Free workspaces see a gated preview: a limited number of recommendations and weaknesses, with the remainder locked until upgrade. Pro shows all findings and opportunities. Locked counts appear in the report UI so you know what Pro unlocks.

Business profile section

Alongside findings, each analysis extracts a business profile: product, target customers, positioning, messaging clarity, documentation quality, and trust signals. Use it as the source of truth when generating Studio assets so FAQ and schema stay consistent with how the crawl understands you.

FAQ